Legal Opinion

State v. O'BANNON

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 15, 2012No. 20090241-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

T1 Defendant Cameron Clint O'Bannon appeals from his jury conviction of child abuse, a second degree felony. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-109(2)(a) (Supp.2011). 1 O'Bannon asserts that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the eggshell plaintiff doctrine because the instruction incorrectly explained the mental state the State was required to prove to obtain a conviction for second degree felony child abuse. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

BACKGROUND 2

1. The Victim's Injuries

12 In the fall of 2005, a mother and her eleven-month-old son (the victim)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. JeffriesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wren v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Randy L. Brackett v. Howard Peters and Roland W. BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. State v. LawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. State v. DeverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. State v. O'BannonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API