United States v. Baker
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The court has before it cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff United States of America and defendants Har-well Marion Baker and Anne Evelyn Morgan Baker. The court concludes, for the following reasons, that it must grant the government’s motion and deny the Bakers’.
I
In evaluating summary judgment motions, this court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving parties. Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); Carlin Communication, Inc., v. Southern Bell Tel. &…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Carlin Communication, Inc., Etc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. OlavarrietaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Stewart v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- United States v. GelleyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022