Legal Opinion
Aida R. Gil v. Jorge Dopico; Robert F. Murphy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 2026No. 1:25-cv-07274Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AIDA R. GIL, Plaintiff, 25-CV-7274 (KMW) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL JORGE DOPICO; ROBERT F. MURPHY, Defendants. KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated her federal constitutional rights. By Order dated December 4, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 (ECF No. 7.) The Court dismisses this action for the reasons set forth below. STANDARD OF…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.