Vaughan v. Tetzlaff
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The plaintiff-appellant sued for specific performance of a real estate contract with the defendants. The trial court found that the parties had not agreed on a critical contract term, and concluded that the contract was so uncertain as to bar the remedy of specific performance. We reverse.
The plaintiff, as buyer, and defendants, as sellers, signed a contract which described the land to be conveyed as follows:
23 +/- (twenty-three plus or minus) acres located on Morse Hill Road, adjacent to lands of Orla Reed on the North and East, and containing a right of way to said land on the north,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
- Reynolds v. SullivanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Scott v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Frogate v. KissellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Villeneuve v. BovatSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fisher v. PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Cameron v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Kenneth W. Miller, II v. Eric FlegenheimerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Crawford v. FarringtonVermont Superior Court · 2011
- Kenneth W. Miller, II v. Eric FlegenheimerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.