Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Tetzlaff

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 6, 1982No. 145-81PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The plaintiff-appellant sued for specific performance of a real estate contract with the defendants. The trial court found that the parties had not agreed on a critical contract term, and concluded that the contract was so uncertain as to bar the remedy of specific performance. We reverse.

The plaintiff, as buyer, and defendants, as sellers, signed a contract which described the land to be conveyed as follows:

23 +/- (twenty-three plus or minus) acres located on Morse Hill Road, adjacent to lands of Orla Reed on the North and East, and containing a right of way to said land on the north,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
  2. Reynolds v. SullivanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. Scott v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  4. Frogate v. KissellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Villeneuve v. BovatSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Cameron v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Kenneth W. Miller, II v. Eric FlegenheimerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Crawford v. FarringtonVermont Superior Court · 2011
  5. Kenneth W. Miller, II v. Eric FlegenheimerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API