State ex inf. Ryan ex rel. Cross v. Bond
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from the action of the trial court in dismissing an information in the nature of quo warranto on the basis that Donald T. Cross and Harold M. Light, at whose relation the information was filed by the circuit attorney for the City of St. Louis, did not have such special or peculiar interest in the matter to give them standing to maintain the action. We have exclusive appellate jurisdiction on the basis that title of respondents to an “office under this state” is involved. Mo.Const. art. V, § 3; State ex inf. Mitchell ex rel. Goodman v. Heath, 345 Mo. 226, 132…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. RileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. School Dist.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State on the Information of Mitchell v. HeathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State ex inf. Graham ex rel. Mississippi County ex rel. Bishop v. HurleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State ex rel. Socialist Workers' Party of Missouri v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burns v. KurtenbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Rolla School District No. 31 v. NorthernMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Burns v. KurtenbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982