People ex rel. Dougan v. District Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Application for writ of prohibition. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.
No argument is necessary to show that if petitioners are entitled to any relief in this cause, prohibition is the proper proceeding therefor. The court below has taken jurisdiction of the contempt case; it has tried petitioners and adjudged them guilty of contempt; it has deferred sentence, but threatens to pronounce the *535same. There is no final judgment subject to review in this court by appeal, by writ of error, or by certiorari. No imprisonment has followed a sentence pronounced, and relief by habeas corpus cannot be invoked. Yet imprisonment may be a part of the sentence, and before aid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Dickey v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Batchelder v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Coughlin v. EhlertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
- Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cooper v. People Ex Rel. WyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Leonhart v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.