Legal Opinion
Town of Harrison v. Aldenberg
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided March 25, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, P.J.
This is an action by a Maine township to enforce a judgment for attorney’s fees and costs issued by a Maine court against the Massachusetts defendants for their violation of Maine conservation laws. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the Maine judgment was a penalty and thus unenforceable in this Commonwealth under G.L.c. 235, §23A The trial court granted the plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment, and the defendants filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. RADA, Rule 8C appeal. ,
The material facts are undisputed. Defendants Robert and Am Adenberg (“the Adenbergs”) are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Montello v. SmithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Ward v. JamesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999