Legal Opinion

Atlas Power Technologies, Inc. v. Sidney W. Hinton; Utility Innovation Holdings, Inc.; Utility Innovation Group, LLC; and Gridsure, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided December 3, 2025No. 5:25-cv-00783Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:25-CV-00783-M ATLAS POWER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. ORDER SIDNEY W. HINTON; UTILITY INNOVATION HOLDINGS, INC.; UTILITY INNOVATION GROUP, LLC; and GRIDSURE, LLC; Defendants. This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. DE 5. For the reasons explained and subject to the limitations detailed below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To obtain a temporary restraining order (TRO), the movant must show “he is likely to succeed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hughes Network Systems, Incorporated v. Interdigital Communications Corporation, Formerly Known as International Mobile MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Fmc Corporation v. Taiwan Tainan Giant Industrial Co., Ltd., and Frederick G. FierchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API