Legal Opinion

Lingenfelter v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1900No. 18,764PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellant filed his complaint in the lower court to recover damages for injuries sustained by falling into a pit situated upon the premises of appellee. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and judgment was rendered against the appellant for cost. ,

The only question presented is: Are the facts, as stated in the complaint, sufficient to entitle appellee to a recovery? It appears, from the facts averred therein, that the defendant is a railroad company, and, at the time plaintiff sustained his injury, owned and operated a railroad in this State, a part of said road being located in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Reardon v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Redigan v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Fort Wayne National Bank v. DoctorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Matthews v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API