State v. Vinson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
At the close of State’s evidence, defendant moved for the disclosure of the identity of the unnamed male who introduced defendant and Agent Branch. After receiving arguments the trial court denied the motion. In his first assignment' of error, defendant claims this denial constituted prejudicial error and cites as authority for this position the cases of Roviaro v. U. S., 353 U.S. 53, 1 L.Ed. 2d 639, 77 S.Ct. 623 (1957), and McLawhorn v. State of North Carolina, 484 F. 2d 1 (4th Cir. 1973).
*320In Roviaro, supra, the defendant was indicted on two counts of violating the Narcotic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Herman Russell McLawhorn III v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.