Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Chamblin
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond in a proceeding to condemn land. To a judgment ascertaining the value of the land, the petitioner assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The Seaboard Air Line Railway presented its petition in the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, in which it shows, that in order to provide for the convenient conduct of its business in the city of Richmond it desires to acquire the fee-simple interest in that certain piece or parcel of land, with improvements there*43on, constituting a part of the real estate occupied by the Richmond Iron Works, known as the Chamblin & Scott property; that the fee-simple interest in the tract of land referred to was the partnership property of the late James H.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Presbrey v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- May v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
3Cited by25 opinions
- Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- City of Norfolk v. SnyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Tuckahoe Woman's Club v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Bonafield's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.