Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. State

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 18, 1974No. 1047-2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

In this appeal we hold that the City of Seattle is entitled to a refund or credit for excise taxes paid on revenue received from customers of its Department of Lighting, where such revenue was received exclusively for the cost of conversion from an overhead to an underground electric power distribution system.

The City of Seattle, through its Department of Lighting, “Seattle City Light,” engages in the business of furnishing electric power in Seattle and nearby areas. In most residential neighborhoods the electrical energy is supplied by means of an overhead distribution network. However, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King County Water District No. 68 v. Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. City of Seattle v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of Kennewick v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Sprint Spectrum v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API