Frady v. Werthan Bag Corp.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt
This is a workmen’s compensation case and the suit Avas dismissed by the trial judge on the ground that he found that petitioner was not suffering from silicosis. This appeal resulted.
The petitioner was regularly employed by the Werthan Bag Corporation, a textile manufacturing plant. His work consisted of grinding metal teeth of the carding machines with abrasives made of emery, sand and other grinding compounds and he charges that in breathing the dust from this work and the small particles of lint in the air, he contracted silicosis and as a result, he became totally and permanently…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. Wabash Screen Door Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- McBrayer v. Dixie Mercerizing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Storie v. Taylor Supply Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Tipton v. North American Rayon Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Wright v. ArmstrongTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Shale Products Corp. v. CaseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Strader v. United Family Life Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Strader v. United Family Life Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966