Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Vanguard Federal Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 1989No. 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Mr. and Mrs. Livingston, as representatives of a class, have taken this appeal from a trial court order sustaining the preliminary objections filed by Vanguard Federal Savings Bank. In so ruling the trial court dismissed Appellants’ complaint which alleged that Vanguard’s method of computing interest on prepayments made on mobile home loans was not permitted by Pennsylvania law under 69 Pa.S.A. § 623 G.5. The trial court accepted Vanguard’s position that the Pennsylvania statute, which prohibits the imposition of prepayment penalties on mobile home installment contracts, was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gingold v. Audi-Nsu-Auto Union, A.G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Heist v. EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, FSB.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Pysh v. Security Pacific Housing ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. CHIJIOKE-UCHE v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API