Legal Opinion

Wolanin v. Hashagen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.

1Í1 Appellants, Clinton and Caroline Hashagen, appeal from the contempt order entered on May 2, 2002. We remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 The underlying action concerns ownership and use of a pond. On July 30, 1992, Plaintiffs/Appellees Janusz and Maria Wolanin (“the Wolanins”) filed an action to determine ownership of the pond. On January 20, 1995, the trial court issued a final decree. The court ruled that the Wolanins owned the pond, and that Appellants are prohibited from using it. On October 30, 1995, this Court affirmed the final decree. Wolanin v. Hashagen, 449 Pa.Super. 712, 673…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steel v. WeisbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gunther v. BolusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Gibney, L. v. Evolution Marketing ResearchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. J.R. v. D.D.D.A., Appeal of: D.D.D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Jackson Twp. Supervisors v. Estate of C. Gresh, D. Gresh, AdministratorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. K.M.G. v. H.M.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API