Associated Engineers, Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ROCHE, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover upon a policy of insurance issued by defendant. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. The insurance contract was executed in California and it is not disputed that California law is applicable in deciding the substantive issues of the case.
On June 3, 1957, plaintiff was engaged by the City of Los Altos to construct a sanitary sewage system. On July 9, 1957, defendant issued to plaintiff a policy insuring all property of plaintiff to be used in connection with said construction against all risk of physical loss or damage for one year.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Abrams v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Frank Coluccio Construction Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Baugh-Belarde Construction Co. v. College Utilities Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Western Employers Insurance v. Arciero & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.