Legal Opinion

Vintimilla v. National Lumber Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 6, 2013No. 12-P-1101Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarhart, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the allowance of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his claim for negligent entrustment and the denial of his motion to amend his complaint. We affirm.

Background. The plaintiff, Miguel Vintimilla, filed a complaint against National Lumber Company (National Lumber) alleging negligent entrustment. Subsequently, Vintimilla moved to amend his claim by adding a count alleging unfair or deceptive acts or practices pursuant to G. L. c. 93A. The judge, in a *494detailed memorandum, allowed summary judgment in favor of National Lumber. At the same time, the judge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. BedardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Roman v. Trustees of Tufts CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Kennie v. Natural Resource DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Mitchell v. Hastings & Koch Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Davis v. WalentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API