Legal Opinion

Longstaff v. Mills

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1989No. 88-117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice, Retired.

Appellant’s complaint appears to allege an oral contract. The trial judge sustained a Motion to Dismiss on the ground that the statute of limitations had run against the claim.1

Appellant presents the issues to be:

1. Does Plaintiffs complaint state a claim upon which relief can be granted on grounds sufficient to withstand a rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss?

2. Was Defendant Mills[’] motion to dismiss under WRCP 12(b)(6) converted to a motion for summary judgment?

3. Did the Court err in granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint?

4. Did the Court abuse…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Investment & Securities Co. v. BuntenWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API