Legal Opinion
State v. Donaghy
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 8, 2000No. 99-405PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dooley J.
Defendant Kenneth Donaghy appeals from his conviction of domestic assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1042. He seeks a new trial on the grounds that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to prove the element of “attempt” beyond a reasonable doubt, and (2) the trial court failed to properly consider his challenge, under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), to the prosecutor’s pattern of gender-based peremptory jury challenges. On the second point, defendant argues that the trial court failed to make findings, required by Batson, on whether he had established a prima facie case, and then failed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edmonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- People v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. DonaghySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.