Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1992No. 1351-89PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of robbery. The trial court assessed punishment at thirty years confinement. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.42(d). On direct appeal, the conviction was reversed and an acquittal ordered, Lane v. State, 713 S.W.2d 223 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986); however, we granted the State’s petition for discretionary review, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the cause for consideration of appellant’s remaining points of error. Lane v. State, 763 S.W.2d 785 (Tex.Cr.App.1989). On remand…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Nunfio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Guerra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Battie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Goff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Wilder v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API