Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Pacheco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. This action was brought against the State Treasurer to recover possession of ten State bonds. • The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Shaftee, J.

The complaint states that the plaintiff, in the year 1858, was the owner of ten State bonds of the State of California, issued under the Act of April 38,1857; that in the year 1858, he deposited the bonds with one John H. Grass, of Sacramento, for the sole purpose of collecting and receiving the coupons, or interest, as the same.should from time to time fall due ; that thereafter, in September, 1860, Grass, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent, and against the statute in such case made and provided, and with intent to steal said bonds and the coupons attached…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutton v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Gagliardo v. HoberlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Wixon v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Graham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Estate of DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Beans v. EmanuelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Chase v. Alaska F. & L. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API