Legal Opinion
State v. Franz
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1995No. 18538PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Edgar 0. Franz (Franz) appeals his sentence for grand theft by receiving stolen property. We affirm.
FACTS
Franz’s conviction arises out of the theft of an automobile in Rapid City, South Dakota in mid-June, 1993. On September 15, 1993, state filed an amended information changing Franz with one count of grand theft, an alternative count of receiving stolen property 1 and one count of hit and run with property damage. 2 Along with the information, state filed a Part II habitual offender information alleging that Franz was previously convicted of grand theft in Meade County, South Dakota in 1992.
P…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Elfring v. PatersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Schultze v. Landmark Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Fin-Ag, Inc. v. Pipestone Livestock Auction Market, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Schwan v. BurgdorfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Application of Black Hills PowerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.