Legal Opinion
Paatalo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 12, 2015No. Case No. 6:15-cv-01420-AAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff William J. Paatalo seeks a declaratory judgment deeming null and void *1241the 2009 foreclosure of his home loan and trustee’s sale of the property securing the loan. Defendant JPMorgan Chase, the purchaser of the property at the trustee’s sale, moves to dismiss. For the reasons set forth .below, defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
In 2006, plaintiff refinanced the loan on his property (‘the property*) in Yachats, Oregon. Compl. ¶ 2. He obtained a $880,000 ‘Option Arm* loan and a nearly $110,000 (later increased to $155,000) home eguity line of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. GerberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- U.S. Bank Nat. Assn as Trustee v. NaifehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Kelley v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA (In re Kelley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2016