Legal Opinion

Davis v. HDR Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 25, 2023No. 2:21-cv-01903Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Carol Davis, No. CV-21-01903-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 HDR Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 In her First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Carol Davis alleges Defendant HDR 16 Incorporated unlawfully collected electronic communications of private Facebook groups 17 in violation of the Federal Wiretap Act,

18 U.S.C. §§ 2510, et seq., the Stored 18 Communications Act,

18 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq., and the common law right to privacy. 19 (Doc. 18). Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s original complaint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
Michael Snow v. Directv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.