Legal Opinion
Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 2, 1998No. 98-1035PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Following a trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an injunction prohibiting Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc., (Ad-Con) from selling certain positive displacement flowmeters that were determined to infringe Flowdata’s United States Patent No. 4,815,318. Appellants Galen M. Cotton, Jack D. Harshman, and Truflo Instrumentation, Inc., (Truflo) were subsequently determined to be in contempt of that injunction and were assessed civil contempt penalties in the amount of Flowdata’s damages and attorney fees. We affirm the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Abbott Laboratories v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Brine, Inc. v. STX, L.L.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- California Expanded Metal Products Company v. James KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021