Breckenridge v. Johnston
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
AILSHIE, C. J.,
Dissenting. — The effect of the majority opinion is recognition of the right of a municipal corporation to repudiate a legally contracted obligation. I cannot agree to such a doctrine.
When these bonds were issued by the district and purchased by appellant, it was contracted, and the purchaser had a right to believe the contract would be kept, that interest coupons would be paid as they fell due and that the bonds would be paid at or before maturity. (Straus v. Ketchen, 54 Ida. 56, 28 Pac. (2d) 824.) That much stands conceded. But if has been argued that the bondholder had his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Nampa v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- United Pacific Insurance v. BakesIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Bashore v. AdolfIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Eldridge v. Black Canyon Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.