People v. Bravo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the jury instructions were erroneous is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Floyd, 34 AD3d 494, 495 [2006]). In any event, this Court is persuaded that the jury would have “gathered from [the] language [of the instructions] the correct standard to be applied [in reaching] its decision” (People v Lopez, 200 AD2d 767, 768 [1994]), and that the trial court’s error, if any, did not deny the defendant a fair trial (see People v Saunders, 64 NY2d 665 [1984]).
The defendant also contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed upon the ground of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. AdamoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WhitlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. OrmsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. OrmsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.