Legal Opinion
People v. Burgos
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*690The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the challenges he now raises to portions of the prosecutor’s summation (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bey, 71 AD3d 1156, 1157 [2010]; People v Philbert, 60 AD3d 698, 699 [2009]; People v Gill, 54 AD3d 965 [2008]; People v Gillespie, 36 AD3d 626 [2007]; People v Siriani, 27 AD3d 670 [2006]). In any event, the challenged remarks were fair comment on the evidence, responsive to arguments and theories raised by the defense, or otherwise remained within the “broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument” (People v Galloway,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GillespieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FuhrtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014