Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Markley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 7, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Hoard on motion, under rule 213, to strike out bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Garrison, V. C.

(orally).

This is a hearing upon a motion made by the defendants for leave to withdraw their answer to the original bill, and to move to strike out the bill for want of equity, and various parts of the bill for specific reasons stated.

Upon a hearing had on the 10th day of December, 1906, it appeared to the court that the face of the bill disclosed a cause of action so old that, in default of explanation, the court would be inclined to dismiss the same for laches if the defendants had so moved the court. The court not finding among the reasons or objections of the defendants any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Foley v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. GuidySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Melosh v. MeloshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Sobota v. ShafferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Regan v. Cozy Lake, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API