Sobota v. Shaffer
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The motion is based on two grounds, the first being, in effect, that the complainants are in laches because they waited nearly two years after executing their bond and discovering the defendants' alleged fraud before seeking the relief they now pray. Laches involves something more than mere delay. There must be delay for a length of time which unexplained and unexcused is unreasonable under the circumstances and which has been prejudicial to the defendants (Massie v. Asbestos Brake Co.,95 N.J. Eq. 298, 311), and the complainants should be given the opportunity to prove the facts on final…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massie v. Asbestos Brake Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Gendre v. ByrnesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1888
- Sweeny v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883
- Stevenson v. MarkleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crandol v. GarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- 536 Broad St. v. Valco Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Staub v. Lafayette Piece Dye Works, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946