Legal Opinion

Lee v. Insurance Co. of North America

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1988No. 12286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, CJ.

In this case we address the question of whether “stacking” of uninsured motorist coverage should be permitted under a single “Business Auto Policy” covering a group of 1,106 separately owned vehicles. We granted certiorari to review the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the lower court’s grant of summary judgment to Respondent Insurance Company of North America (INA) on the issue of stacking. We affirm the intermediate court’s conclusion that stacking should be denied under these facts, however, we disagree with the intermediate court’s reasoning…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  3. Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abramson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 942, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1493 Marcia Abramson, Individually and as and Personal Representative of the Estate of Maxwell Abramson, M.D., Deceased Rebecca Abramson, Stuart Abramson and Deborah Abramson Dickerson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Pirkle v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API