Legal Opinion
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided December 14, 1973No. Civ. Nos. 70-574-J-S, 70-577-J-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
CHARLES R. SCOTT, District Judge:
Plaintiffs, two railroad companies, filed these cases seeking injunctive relief restraining the United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) from enforcing an order of the ICC prescribing a scale of incentive per diem charges for general *1013service, unequipped boxcars.1 Ex Parte 252 (Sub-No. 1), Incentive Per Diem, Charges — 1968, 337 I.C.C. 246 (1970). After a three-judge court was constituted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2284 and 2325, a hearing was held on the merits of the complaint. Chicago and North Western Railway…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway, and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company, Intervenors, Burlington Northern Inc. And Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor. Aliquippa and Southern Railroad Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Illinois Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Maine Central Railroad v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Baltimore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.