Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 23, 1975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERNICK, Justice.

Maine jurisprudence has long adhered to the principle that if a motion for judgment of acquittal filed at the conclusion of the State’s case in chief has been overruled and defendant proceeds to present evidence in his own behalf, defendant “waives” the issue of the sufficiency of the State’s prima facie case; thereafter, the adequacy of the evidence to justify conviction is open to challenge only as tested by the totality of the evidence adduced. State v. Rand, 156 Me. 81, 161 A.2d 852 (1960); State v. Rainey, 149 Me. 92, 99 A.2d 78 (1953); State v. Johnson, 145 Me. 30, 71…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. State v. LizotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. LandrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. Van SickleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. State v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. State v. DoucetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API