Legal Opinion
Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2004No. Civil Action No. 03-1577PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
PRATTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Disabled in Action (“DIA”) moves for an Order dismissing Defendant City of Philadelphia (the “City”) without prejudice from this case. The City has executed a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with DIA which resolves all of the claims that DIA had against the City in this matter. The remaining defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), has objected to the Settlement Agreement for various reasons, as discussed herein. For the reasons that *603follow, the Motion to Dismiss the City of Philadelphia is granted.
FA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maia Caplan, in 95-1445 v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman. Maia Caplan v. Fellheimer Eichen Braverman & Kaskey David L. Braverman, Vigilant Insurance Company, in 95-1478Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Sindia Expedition, Inc. v. Wrecked & Abandoned VesselCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Plains Growers, Inc. v. Ickes-Braun Glasshouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Young v. Wilky Carrier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- GAIA GARDENS, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIRDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- PAGAN v. PEREZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- ROSARIO v. STRAWNDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020