Guyton v. North Carolina Board of Transportation
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Plaintiffs contend the trial court’s denial of their motion for a temporary restraining order was error. They argue that the excavation and removal of the old roadway of N. C. Highway No. 133 would constitute a taking of their property which would not be for a public purpose and that injunctive relief is proper to keep a government agency from abusing its powers. We do not agree.
The owner of land which abuts a highway is recognized to have a special right of easement in the highway for access purposes, and this is a property right which cannot be taken from him without just…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Frink v. North Carolina Board of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Hochheiser v. North CaroLina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Department of Transportation v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Viar v. N.C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Hochheiser v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.