Legal Opinion

Guyton v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1976No. 7513SC905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend the trial court’s denial of their motion for a temporary restraining order was error. They argue that the excavation and removal of the old roadway of N. C. Highway No. 133 would constitute a taking of their property which would not be for a public purpose and that injunctive relief is proper to keep a government agency from abusing its powers. We do not agree.

The owner of land which abuts a highway is recognized to have a special right of easement in the highway for access purposes, and this is a property right which cannot be taken from him without just…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Frink v. North Carolina Board of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Hochheiser v. North CaroLina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Department of Transportation v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Viar v. N.C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Hochheiser v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API