Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 7, 1968No. 10, September Term, 1968PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth , J.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury in the Circuit Court for Washington County of breaking a storeroom with intent to steal goods of the value of $100 or more and sentenced to imprisonment for an indeterminate period not to exceed three years. 1 At his trial a confession made by him to the police during a custodial interrogation was admitted in evidence.

“The practice in this State, approved in many cases, is that the court first hears evidence without the jury to determine whether a confession is voluntary and should he admitted. If it decides to admit it, the same evidence is then given…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Pinto v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gaudio v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Dempsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API