Legal Opinion

Stutsman County v. Mansfield

Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota

Decided February 20, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from district court, Stutsman county; Hon. W. H. .FRancis, Judge. The proceedings of the board of county commissioners of Stutsman county show that appellant W. E. Mansñeld, on the Tth day of January, 1885, presented for approval his bond for •county treasurer for the ensuing term, and that it was rejected. Their proceedings of the 8th show that he was present, and waived his right of ten days for qualifying as treasurer, and the waiver was accepted by the board.

Read the full summary

Appeal from district court, Stutsman county; Hon. W. H. .FRancis, Judge. The proceedings of the board of county commissioners of Stutsman county show that appellant W. E. Mansñeld, on the Tth day of January, 1885, presented for approval his bond for •county treasurer for the ensuing term, and that it was rejected. Their proceedings of the 8th show that he was present, and waived his right of ten days for qualifying as treasurer, and the waiver was accepted by the board. The office on that day was declared vacant by them, and George L. Webster was appointed county treasurer until the next…

1Opinion of the Court

Palmee, J,

This action was brought under the provisions of the Code of this territory, and by the county of Stutsman, against the defendants, upon an official bond, executed by defendant Mansfield as principal and the other defendants as sureties; said bond bearing date the 2d day of January, A. D. 1883, and conditioned for the faithful and impartial discharge by said Mansfield of the duties of the office of county treasurer, and a true and correct accounting for all moneys, credits, accounts, and property which should come into his hands, and delivery of the same over, according to law, etc.

Th…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Emery v. . PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Hazleton v. Union Bank of ColumbusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Pier v. HeinrichoffenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Teetshorn v. HullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Sheridan v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Jenkinson v. City of VermillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Waldner v. Bowden State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Strait v. City of EurekaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API