Legal Opinion

Strait v. City of Eureka

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, McPherson county. Hon. Loring E. G-affy, Judge. Action by Dyer B. Strait against the city of Eureka. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPuller, J.

By an exception to the action of the trial court in overruling the defendant’s objection to the introduction of any testimony on the part of plaintiff, we are first called to determine whether facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action are stated in the following complaint: • “That the- defendant, city of Eureka, is a municipal corporation, organized under the law of this state approved March 6, 1890, the act being chapter 37 of the Session Laws of said year. That on the 10th day of October, 1901, and for more than a year prior thereto, the sidewalk of said city in front of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BurnsideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Anderson v. AlsethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stutsman County v. MansfieldSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Brasel v. MyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Stenson v. ElfmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Fritz v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Schwitz v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API