Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1929No. 21604Published

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The facts alleged in the petition are by the demurrer conceded to be true. The petition alleges that the relator was injured in the course of his employment, that he was an employee of an employer employing five or more workmen, and that his employer was a person by the name of Bonney, who had failed to comply with the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The relator applied to the commission for and was awarded compensation. Bonney, being notified of the commission’s finding, asked for a rehearing upon the ground that one Bergman, and not he, was the relator’s employer. Bonney’s request for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State, Ex Rel., Davis v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Chicago v. Van Schaack Bros. Chemical Works, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API