Legal Opinion
Bratcher v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1996No. 34A05-9504-CR-153PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
A judge found Phillip Bratcher (“Bratcher”) guilty of possession of marijuana, a class A misdemeanor. 1 In his appeal, Bratcher presents one issue for our review which we restate as whether the trial court erred in admitting marijuana seized from Bratcher.
We affirm.
The facts most favorable to the State reveal that Kokomo Police Officer Deric Bero-shok (“Officer Beroshok”) was dispatched to a domestic disturbance. While en route, another officer advised him that one of the individuals involved had just left in a grey and black Ford Thunderbird. Officer Bero-shok observed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bivins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Platt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WondersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- D.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.