Parker v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, Michael Parker challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence and raises two issues which we restate as:
I. Whether an investigatory stop based upon a tip from a known informant exceeded the guidelines set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio.1
II. Whether the police officer's seizure of cocaine from Parker exceeded the bounds of such a stop. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY2
On July 25, 1994, Sergeant Steven Swarm of the nareoties/vice unit of the Indianapolis *995Police Department received a tip…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Frasier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Coleman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jevon R. Bates-Smith v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.