City of Dayton v. Cloud
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
The issue herein is the constitutionality o£ R. 0. Chapter 725. The pertinent facts are not in dispute.
Appellant raises four questions of law, necessitating an examination by this court of Section 2 of Article XII, and Section 2 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution. Section 2 of Article XII, to which we address ourselves first, reads, in pertinent part:
“* * * Land and improvements thereon shall be taxed by uniform rule according to value * * * and without limiting the general power, subject to the provisions of Article 1 of this Constitution, to determine the subjects and methods of taxation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Denison University v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Allerton Parking Corp. v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Swetland v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Chu Bros. Tulsa Partnership, P.L.L. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re Old Carco LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.