Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Cloud

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1972No. 71-739PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

The issue herein is the constitutionality o£ R. 0. Chapter 725. The pertinent facts are not in dispute.

Appellant raises four questions of law, necessitating an examination by this court of Section 2 of Article XII, and Section 2 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution. Section 2 of Article XII, to which we address ourselves first, reads, in pertinent part:

“* * * Land and improvements thereon shall be taxed by uniform rule according to value * * * and without limiting the general power, subject to the provisions of Article 1 of this Constitution, to determine the subjects and methods of taxation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Denison University v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State Ex Rel. Allerton Parking Corp. v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Swetland v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Chu Bros. Tulsa Partnership, P.L.L. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In Re Old Carco LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API