Legal Opinion
Care and Treatment of Burgess v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 2002No. 24443PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Presiding Judge.
This appeal arises out of a proceeding instituted under Missouri’s “Sexually Vio lent Predator” legislation, §§ 632.480-.513 (the “Act”). 1 As allowed by § 632.486, RSMo Cum.Supp. (1998) the attorney general on March 2, 1999, filed a petition in the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of Greene County alleging Kenneth K. Burgess (“Burgess”) “may meet the criteria of a sexually violent predator.”
During the pendency of the case, Burgess filed a third-party petition naming the attorney general (“Nixon”), the director of the Missouri Department of Health…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Beets v. TylerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Robin Farms, Inc. v. BeelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Multidata Systems International Corp. v. ZhuMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Gunter v. City of St. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Stewart v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Poe v. MitchenerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Picerno v. Nichols-FoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.