Legal Opinion

Xiao Ping Chen v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 28, 2009No. 62838-1-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl A municipality has a duty to all travelers to maintain its roadways in conditions that are safe for ordinary travel. Whether roadway conditions are reasonably safe for ordinary travel depends on the circumstances surrounding a particular roadway. Although relevant to the determination of whether a municipality has breached its duty, evidence that a particular physical defect in a roadway rendered the roadway dangerous or misleading or evidence that a municipality was in violation of a law concerning roadway safety measures are not essential to a claim that a municipality breached the duty…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alexander v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Wuthrich v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Austin K. Fite, V. City Of PuyallupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  4. Austin K. Fite, V. City Of PuyallupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Cindy Alexander, Appellants/cross-resp. v. Gary Sanford, Respondents/cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API