Legal Opinion
Pelt v. Guardsmark, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1984No. 83-CA-844PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
451 So.2d 621 (1984)
Reginald PELT
v.
GUARDSMARK, INC., et al.
No. 83-CA-844.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
May 14, 1984.
Gregory D. Frost, Lee, Greenfield & Frost, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.
Stephen R. Wilson, Keogh, Cox & Wilson, Ltd., Baton Rouge, Wayne J. Fontana, McGlinchey, Stafford, Mintz, Cellini & Lang, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.
Before CHEHARDY, BOWES and DUFRESNE, JJ.
DUFRESNE, Judge.
This appeal comes before us from a judgment of the district court on a consolidated action in tort and workmen's compensation. The plaintiff, Reginald Pelt, filed a petition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Bolden v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Faucheux v. Hooker Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. NedeffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Martin v. Kroger Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Bryant v. MilliganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Duffy v. DuffyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Granger v. JEFFERSON PARISH DEPT. OF REC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.