Legal Opinion

Benefit Trust Life Insurance v. Union National Bank of Pittsburgh

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 15, 1985No. Nos. 84-3780, 84-3801 and 84-3812PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

A murder prosecution against the primary beneficiary lasting for a number of years delayed the determination of the proper payees of life insurance proceeds. The district court decided that in the interim the insurance company was required to interplead and pay the proceeds into court. Having failed to do so, the company became liable for interest at the rate it had realized, one which was in excess of the legal rate. We conclude that there is no duty of interpleader in Pennsylvania and that the carrier is responsible for prejudgment interest, but only…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Penneys v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company v. Union National Bank Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API