Legal Opinion

Pflugh v. Pflugh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1983No. 1302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from an order dismissing appellant’s motion to strike appellee’s petition for alimony and equitable distribution. Two issues are raised. First, it is argued that appellee failed to apply for leave to proceed under the provision of the No-Fault Divorce Code.1 Second, appellant contends that he failed to receive either notice or service of this petition. On the basis of either of these arguments, appellant maintains that the petition for alimony and equita*223ble distribution should have been denied. For the reasons below, we reverse and remand.

The instant divorce…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Toll v. TollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Conrad v. ConradSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Kaskie v. KaskieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Kunkel v. Kunkel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API