Legal Opinion
Ugine-Savoie Imphy v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 31, 2002No. Slip Op. 02-79; 00-08-00423PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the United States International Trade Commission’s (the “Commission”) five-year sunset review determination that revocation of the anti-dumping duty order on stainless steel wire rod (“wire rod”) from France would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See Notice: Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, France, India, and Spain, 65 Fed.Reg. 45,409 (July 21, 2000); Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, France, India, and Spain, USITC Pub. 3321, Inv.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Goss Graphics System, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Angus Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Usec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Usinor, Beautor, Haironville, Sollac Atlantique, Sollac Lorraine v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Wieland Werke, AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.