Legal Opinion
Calocerinos & Spina Consulting Engineers, P.C. v. Prudential Reinsurance Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1994No. 92-CV-6508T, 93-CV-6055TPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TELESCA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated diversity actions brought suit seeking a declaration that they are covered under Prudential Reinsurance Policy PSL00001 (“the Policy”). Both plaintiffs and defendant have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, I hold that neither plaintiff is entitled to coverage under the policy and therefore deny plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing both complaints is granted.
BACKGROUND
Calocerinos & Spina Consulting Engineers (“C & S”) and Mueser-Rutledge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cable Science Corporation v. Rochdale Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Hartford Insurance Group v. MelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Phico Insurance Company v. Providers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Checkrite Ltd., Inc. v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Arkwright Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Home Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Spectrum Information Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Fletcher D. Sapp and Ruth Sapp v. Leopold H. Greif, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- HOME INS. CO. OF IL (NH) v. Spectrum Info. Tech.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.