Legal Opinion

Tabor v. Baltimore City Public Schools

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 2001No. 1866, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. EYLER, Judge.

Under federal law, children with special needs are entitled to special education benefits. See Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. The mother of appellant, Chad Tabor, initiated administrative proceedings in accordance with State law against Baltimore City Public Schools, appellee. The Office of Administrative Hearings conducted a hearing on June 28, 24, and July 19, 1999, pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f) (2000). On August 11, 1999, the administrative law judge issued a decision and advised that any party aggrieved by the decision…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Susan N. David N., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians to M.N. A Minor v. Wilson School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Joseph Spiegler v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. Crowe v. HouseworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James v. Frederick County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  2. John A. Ex Rel. A.A. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Asphalt & Concrete Services, Inc. v. PerryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Gambrill v. Bd. of Education, Dorchester Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Role Models America, Inc. v. PenMar Development Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API